
but despite the confused script of this whole situation, the facts themselves will dictate the international response to the Iranian administration's hardline stance. as is commonly noted, the U.S. is simply stretched too thin to effectively attack Tehran. even bombing the nuclear infrastructure is likely to be ineffective, as it's been noted that Iran buried a large portion of their facilities underground years ago. what's more, many people suspect that Iran, if attacked, would immediately attack Israel and that act would undoubtedly lead to a full scale, multi-national war.
however, in backing away from this apocalyptic hypothesis for a moment, Ahmadinejad -- and Hugo Chavez, for that matter -- are right to challenge the current administration's international policies. very rarely, in fact, are they flat-out wrong about anything they accuse the U.S. gov't of. anybody that tells you that the administration's policy throughout the world is not imperialistic in nature is fooling themselves. there are other ways, though, of combatting U.S. aggression, and acting a fool in front of hundreds of diplomats and leaders, as Chavez did yesterday, is not one of them. eliciting snickers from the gallery does little for one's credibility. Ahmadinejad, while perhaps more eloquent and self-assured than Chavez, goes blah blah blah about dialogue yet refuses to answer a single question anyone poses to him.
but still, i'm not offended by either one of them. most recently, Chavez took a tour through Harlem, referred to Bush as an "alcoholic," likened him to John Wayne and offered to expand his program of offering cheap oil to poor families in NYC.
2006 will be the year that bravado was redefined.

Recent Comments